Euverlèk gebroeker:Ooswesthoesbes

Pagina-inhoud wordt niet ondersteund in andere talen.
Voog köpke toe
Van Wiktionary
Laatste reactie: 15 dagen geleden door RamzyM (WMF) in het onderwerp Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

Wilkóm op mien euverligkpagina. Laot gerös e besjeid nao :)

Ajer berichskes

Utrechse (etc.) wäörd[bewirk]

Jao, iech wèl op d'n door hei wel get mie wäörd oet streektaole touwveuge, es e paar dringender zakes zien oetgeklaord. Iech wouw dat eigelek op nl.wikt doen, meh dao zit iech in 'ne vasgeloupe discussie. Me (d.w.z. d'n insegsten trouwe gebruker) wèlt Hollandse en Braobantse wäörd per se es "spellingsvariante" oonder 't Nederlands zètte. Dat sleit natuurlek nörges op, meh dao weure v'r 't neet euver ins. Steinbach (euverlègk) 9 sep 2020 15:49 (UTC)

Och jao, die discussies kin ich mer al te good... Ich höb ouch dao 'ns aangebaoje veur 't Hoeaglimbörgs óm te zitte, meh de reactie waas zoea law (laes: 0,0 respons), det ich mich mer hie op rich.
Waat betröf li.wikt wil ich 't oppe zelvendje meneer doon es op li.wiki: aop door te kallen en inclusief. Aangezeen Braobantjs en Utrechs noe eimaol gèn standerdspraok zeen, huuere die waat mich betruf ónger 'n eige köpke; zeker es dao dialek-veurbeeldjzinkes en evt. grammatica bie staon. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 9 sep 2020 15:54 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail[bewirk]

Hello Ooswesthoesbes,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 25 sep 2020 18:52 (UTC)

"Baas"[bewirk]

Wat dien ama zeet klop wel, meh dat heet wieneg mèt Mofers of zelfs mer Limbörgs te make. De kreegs vreuger op sjaol de oetspraok vaan vreem taole neet good aongelierd; 't had entans neet de prioriteit die 't noe heet. Ouch mien Hollandse groetawwers doen/dege neet aanders. Dus iech zouw 't gein exoniem wèlle neume. Steinbach (euverlègk) 17 nov 2021 12:51 (UTC)

Ich vinj 't zelf ouch e grensgeval, mer ich vinj 'm sjoean veur 'm illustratief aan te haje. Juus ómdet ich van deze weit det t'r zoea gebroek wuuert. Al die angere sjuuf ich gewuuen eweg :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 17 nov 2021 13:44 (UTC)

Getalle[bewirk]

Aoh, iech zeen tot de "Hoeglimbörgsje" getalle ouch traon mote gluive. Dat ruimp lekker op. :) Steinbach (euverlègk) 4 jan 2022 17:48 (UTC)

Alles geit d'raan gluive :) Es ich 't zoea doortèl haop ich taenge mei de ganse kattegorie laeg te höbbe. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 4 jan 2022 17:59 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users[bewirk]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

4 jan 2022 18:17 (UTC)

What's up?[bewirk]

I was just looking at a certain site (you can probably guess from my username) that I used to contribute to under a different alias out of nostalgia. Since it's now long dead I was hoping we could chat (discord, IRC or the chat on that site are all fine) just to catch up and also to help me get in touch with some of the other users. Kemthatlew (euverlègk) 24 fib 2022 10:35 (UTC)

There is a discord. I'm pretty sure Björn at sliras can give you the link. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 24 fib 2022 14:25 (UTC)

<10³[bewirk]

Perfisia mèt 't ridducere vaan de categorie "Hoeglimbörg" tot oonder de doezend lemma's! (Iech hoop mer tot ze gans verdwene is ietot de bom vèlt....) Steinbach (euverlègk) 2 mie 2022 11:51 (UTC)

Och, det haw ich nag gaar neet gezeen mit die vastelaovesdaag. Danke! :) 't Sjeeltj det ich in Remunj woon (van milletaer en logistiek miniem waerd, of die mótte gaer mirkkleier mótten höbbe), dan mótte die rósse toch al aardig wied gekómme zeen door 't Pruses en Pole. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 3 mie 2022 07:22 (UTC)

'Bieveugelik tèlwaord'[bewirk]

Hèt zoeget neet gewoen e raanktèlwoord? Iech höb 't noets aanders gelierd... Steinbach (euverlègk) 9 nov 2022 12:34 (CET)Reageren

Nae, e rangtèlwaord guuef 'n plaats in 'n lies aan, wie ieëste, twieëdje, derdje enz; "half" guuef 'n wieväölheid aan, meh gèn plaats in 'n optèlling. E bieveugelik tèlwaord is feitelik e bieveugelik naamwaord mit 'n numerieke waerd; en ouch gewuuen houftèlwäörd opgevolg door 'n antecedent vallen hie-ónger "twieë heuj" (=bv tw) taenge "Det zeen 's twieë" (=htw) (intro). De meiste anger Wiktionaries knalle de tèlbaar wäörd gewuuen óngere houftèlwäörd en die die neet te tèlle zeen (half, insigste enz) óngere bieveugelike naamwäörd. Ich höb hie d'rveur gekaozen óm Bakkes te volge dae "ein, twieë, drie" óngere houftèlwäörd ("tw. hoofdtelw.") plaats en "half, insigste, lèste" óngere bieveugelike tèlwäörd ("tw. bijv."). Wiets te kóns zeen staon de bieveugelike-tèlwäördcategorieë ouch gewuuen ónger zoeawaal de tèlwäörd es de bieveugelike naamwäörd, det die mekkelik trögk te vinje zeen. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 9 nov 2022 14:49 (CET)Reageren

freðmýri, hestur, mý[bewirk]

Aoh, es iech 't höb daan moos tiech 't ouch höbbe, zeen iech? :) Steinbach (euverlègk) 30 jun 2023 19:40 (CEST) (Allein deen tölt nog neet.)Reageren

Hahaha, jehzeker. Det kan mien Scandinavisch hert neet verdrage ;) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 30 jun 2023 19:55 (CEST)Reageren
Wat deen tölt betröf: eigelek mooste 't zien en liever nog zelf oetzitte. Meh nao dees nege seconde wètste al aardeg wat 'nen tölt is. Steinbach (euverlègk) 1 jul 2023 22:19 (CEST)Reageren
't Zuutj oet ofwen det paerd klómpveut haet xD Mer ich zal oetsjeie mit beleidige, went ich dörf nag gènne maeter bie die bieëster inne buurt te kómme. Ich haaj mich waal bie mien cavia's :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 2 jul 2023 07:45 (CEST)Reageren

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS[bewirk]

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 10 jul 2023 14:08 (CEST)Reageren

Perfisia[bewirk]

De höbs nao maonde werk ei gans Alabama-woord weggewèrk! :) Steinbach (euverlègk) 19 nov 2023 14:35 (CET)Reageren

Hahahaha, jao. 't Kós tied en mote, meh dan höbs se-n ouch get xD --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 19 nov 2023 14:36 (CET)Reageren

adelek[bewirk]

Volgens sommege lui is adellek 'vaan adel' en adelek 'belege' neet 'tzelfde woord. Dat zal veur die AGL-lui wel rei zien gewees veur 't aanders te spèlle. Steinbach (euverlègk) 29 nov 2023 17:24 (CET)Reageren

Det is intersant, meh wie ich 't dan analizeer is 't nag ummer aal + -lijk, dus a(d)ellik mit twieë kieër 'n l :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 29 nov 2023 17:25 (CET)Reageren

Eerdweeg, zandweeg[bewirk]

Wiezoe zuuste gei versjèl? 't Gief toch nog wel aander groondsoorte es zand? 'ne Zandweeg weurt in de zomer oonbevaarbaar, dao kinste alleen nog te voot of te peerd euver. 'nen Eerde weeg op, iech zègk mer get, löss, dao kinste bij druugte nog prima euver vare en fietse. Steinbach (euverlègk) 30 nov 2023 18:18 (CET)Reageren

Mmm, dao zaes se get. Det zal waal 't veuroeardeil van emes vanne zandjgróndj zeen. Bie Mofert höbbe v'r hel waeg en zandjwaeg mit nieks daotössenin. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 30 nov 2023 19:17 (CET)Reageren

Redirect[bewirk]

Aojao, sorry, dao had iech neet aon gedach. Steinbach (euverlègk) 16 fib 2024 16:04 (CET)Reageren

Gei perbleem, v'r rume de kraom gewuuen op :) Op wónjerbaarlike wies stóng de redirek nag inne kattegorie, anges haw ich dem gaar neet gezeen. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 16 fib 2024 16:05 (CET)Reageren
Ao, ich zeen des te-n 't pas versjuuf hads wie ich al daomit begós woor. Ich perbeer zelf ouch ummer ieës te kónterleren of neet nag e wäördje mit 'n klein lètter is, went ich vinj 't zelf anges ouch zunj xD --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 16 fib 2024 16:16 (CET)Reageren

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[bewirk]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 3 mei 2024 01:11 (CEST)Reageren